A Look at Marginal Costs

The landfill business is, as the name implies, a business. So let’s test your business savvy with a short quiz. Question No. 1 If it costs $10,000 per day to operate your 400-...


The landfill business is, as the name implies, a business. So let’s test your business savvy with a short quiz.

Question No. 1 If it costs $10,000 per day to operate your 400-tpd landfill, what is the cost per ton?

It’s $25/ton. Just divide cost by tons. Based on that simple equation, any landfill could calculate its cost per ton.

Question No. 2 A local hauling company inquires about bringing an additional 100 tpd of waste into your landfill—and they want you to give them a price. Obviously, before you can give them a price, you’ve got to know your cost per ton. So, what is your cost per ton to handle an additional 100 tpd?

Hint: The answer is not $25/ton.

Managing municipal solid waste is more than landfilling: publicity, education, engineering, long-term planning, and landfill gas waste-to-energy are specialties needed in today’s complex environment. We’ve created a handy infographic featuring 6 tips to improve landfill management and achieve excellence in operations.  6 Tips for Excellence in Landfill Operations. Download it now!

In order to calculate what it would cost to add 100 tpd of waste to your landfill, you must think in terms of marginal costs. No, marginal costs aren’t costs based on some flaky estimate that you wrote on the margin of your notebook. In this context, “marginal” is an economic term.

Marginal costs can be thought of as additional costs. For example, if your landfill’s tonnage increased from 400 to 500 tpd, you wouldn’t need to buy more land, build another scale, or drill more groundwater monitoring wells. You wouldn’t need another service truck or a larger shop. There’s also a good chance that you wouldn’t have to buy more tractors or hire more employees. Most likely, you would benefit by being able to amortize the cost of all these things over more tons, resulting in a decreased cost per ton.

Yes, it’s true that your landfill, including the lined areas, will fill up 25% faster. And the increased workload to handle 25% more waste will translate into a few more machine and employee hours. But in terms of overall economics, when tonnage goes up, the cost per ton goes down.

A few years ago I was talking to a well-to-do farmer. This fellow’s farm extended for miles in every direction—almost as far as one could see. He explained his success with a question: “Is it easier to make $1 million per acre on 1 acre or $1 per acre on a million acres?” Judging by his success, I’d say that he understood marginal costs.

Question No. 3 Is it easier to make $1 million/ton on one ton of garbage or $1/ton on a million tons of garbage?

$1/ton on a million tons of garbage.

But the road to success is not paved entirely with marginal costs. The issue of marginal costs can hurt you if you aren’t paying close attention.

Despite Bill Cosby’s statement that “there’s always room for Jello,” there comes a time when there just isn’t room, no way, no how. And so it is with garbage.

While it’s generally good (in terms of economics) to add tonnage to your landfill, consider what would happen if you surpassed your dozer’s capability by one ton of garbage. That’s right. That additional ton just cost you half a million dollars for a second bulldozer. Now of course we know that the line between the bulldozer keeping up or not keeping up isn’t as narrow as one ton of trash. However, there is a point where one dozer just won’t keep up.

So if you’re out there courting more tonnage for your landfill, be sure you aren’t flirting with disaster. Know where your trigger points are: those points where a little extra garbage is going to require a big (additional) capital investment.

As an example, let’s take a look at the dozer’s cost per ton of garbage. Just in case you’re a visual learner, the graph shows how the dozer’s cost is amortized over various tonnages.

Like any piece of equipment, the dozer’s cost depends upon the amount of work it does. In this case, the work is measured in tons of garbage per day. Suppose, for example, that a single dozer can handle a maximum of 400 tons of garbage per day (based on a fixed push distance).

Thus, when the dozer is handling 400 tpd, its costs are spread over the maximum number of tons it can handle and its costs are minimized. If it were to handle only 100 tpd, however, its cost per ton would be significantly higher.

Based on this line of thinking, you might say, “If that’s the case, then we should handle as much garbage as possible; that is, more tons per hour.”

Managing municipal solid waste is more than landfilling: publicity, education, engineering, long-term planning, and landfill gas waste-to-energy are specialties needed in today’s complex environment. We’ve created a handy infographic featuring 6 tips to improve landfill management and achieve excellence in operations. 6 Tips for Excellence in Landfill Operations. Download it now!  

However, consider what happens when the tonnage increases just past the point where one machine can’t keep up and a second machine is required. The cost per ton is then “bumped” up because now you have the cost of two dozers to amortize more than approximately 400 tpd. Then, if the tonnage continues to increase, the cost per ton will slowly decrease to a minimum point where both dozers are once again working at full capacity.

The key is that the dozer’s amortized cost (per ton) decreases as the (marginal) tonnage increases. But once the tonnage increases beyond what one dozer can handle – wham! – costs increase. This same pattern continues each time another dozer is added.

This same thing happens whenever tonnage increases require you to spend money on what might be considered fixed costs.

These are the two sides to marginal costs. Be sure you consider both of them before you negotiate to receive additional garbage at your landfill. If you don’t, your ability to manage the landfill might be considered somewhat marginal.

No more results found.
No more results found.