Welcome to 2019, where China’s withdrawal from the international recovered commodity market continues. The items being moved to China’s list of banned materials are increasingly less of what we might consider “waste,” like bottles and cans, and more of what many might consider simply “materials,” such as scrap plastics from industrial processes. This is a reflection of the depth and breadth of the market changes we are seeing—it’s not just about contaminated bales or fractured trade relations. As solid waste managers at Gershman, Brickner & Bratton Inc., we know our clients and colleagues are wondering about the impacts of this market disruption on their curbside and commercial recycling programs. We have advised our clients that what we are currently experiencing is a market disruption, not a market failure.

We’re not alone in saying that the market goes up and down, and we already see signs of domestic recycling making progress. Public-private and private-private partnerships are being signed into action to help close the resource loop, jurisdictions are expanding programs, recyclers are incorporating technology to clean up their streams and legislation is coming on line to help make food donation easier. Some folks, understandably, are still wondering about upcoming decisions they have to make regarding programs, contracts, etc. While nobody can predict the future, we know that recyclable materials remain useful and valuable—we just have to adjust how we get them from generator to user. And so, in the spirit of optimism, we offer the following rebuttals to common misconceptions to reassure even the most doubtful about the future of recycling:

Misconception: Postconsumer materials don’t have use as feedstock.

Reality: Actually, they do! Cardboard is highly recyclable, with any given box being about 50 percent recycled. Recovering metal is a practice only slightly newer than the use of metal itself. These materials, along with plastic flake and pellets, remain the building blocks of new products.

Misconception: Feedstocks can’t be adequately recovered.

Reality: Just wait. Recyclers are already rapidly inventing new ways to do so. For example, paper plants are making modifications to take a wider variety of paper products at their gates instead of relying on beneficiation.

Misconception: There is no demand for materials.

Reality: Yes there is! Monetary value is only one indicator of demand. The American Forest & Paper Association reports that almost half of recovered paper is used in the U.S. to produce boxes, boxboard and components of wallboard. Current metals tariffs are restricting imported supplies, opening up opportunity for U.S. scrap, which is good news for domestic companies.

Misconception: The future supply of recycling materials is uncertain.

Reality: Clearly, people, businesses and governments continue to demonstrate interest in, and dedication to, recovering recyclable materials. Thirty years after the second wave of recycling hit in the 1990s, recycling is considered a basic urban and suburban service.

Misconception: There is no reason to continue recycling because the economics don’t justify it.

Reality: The facts remain that recycling metal uses significantly less energy than sourcing ore to create virgin metal, burying nonrenewable resources is not always the most sustainable solution and production of recyclable waste items will continue for the foreseeable future. Recycling doesn’t necessarily have to pay for itself. The ultimate goal is sustainability, and the best solution is one that keeps the triple bottom line in mind. All people live in one interconnected environment, and there’s no such place as “away.”

There are always roadblocks on the pathway to success. Stay positive, stay creative, keep partnerships in mind and welcome this new year with open arms. 2019 will challenge us, but we’re strong and ready for it!

While decision by committee is a daunting prospect for many equipment purchasers, a coalition of municipal solid waste facilities in northern Minnesota found that weighing the pros and cons of various material handlers as a team helped build consensus and instill a comfort level for operators before purchasing.

Beltrami County, Minnesota, participates in a regional integrated solid waste management program that includes the adjoining counties of Polk, Clearwater, Hubbard, Mahnomen and Norman.

Beltrami and Polk Counties, along with the four other adjacent counties, applied for, and were awarded, a capital assistance grant through the state of Minnesota to upgrade their respective transfer stations. That grant allocated funds for new equipment purchases, and the counties joined together to maximize their purchasing power.

“We originally came together to apply for grant money to upgrade our equipment. Knowing that we would need multiple machines, we coordinated our programs as an approach to leverage better pricing and lower costs for ongoing maintenance,” Beltrami County Solid Waste Coordinator Brian Olson says.

Beyond price, the group wanted to make sure the new equipment would be user-friendly and easy to maintain. That’s why Olson says the coalition left no stone unturned when evaluating their options. The group brought in a number of vendors to showcase the latest material handlers on the market.

After weighing the pros and cons of each piece of equipment, the group settled on the 818 E-Series mobile material handler from Germany-based Sennebogen.

“We invited several manufacturers to come up here and give us their spiel. We wanted to make sure we were getting the right machine for the purposes we have,” Olson says. “We had our machine operators, our mechanics and our administrators all take part in evaluating the proposals. And that’s how Sennebogen came out on top.”

The regional distributor for Sennebogen equipment, Road Machinery & Supplies Co. (RMS) of Savage, Minnesota, recently delivered a total of four Sennebogen material handlers to waste handling facilities in Beltrami and Polk Counties. One of the Sennebogen machines is being used to sort material at the Bemidji Solid Waste Transfer Station in Beltrami County, while three others are located at the Polk County material recovery facility (MRF) site in Fosston.

Different strokes

Beltrami County generates 30,000 tons of solid waste per year. Its facilities accept recyclables in the form of tin and aluminum cans, glass bottles and jars, plastics No. 1 and No. 2, various fiber materials, appliances, scrap metal, fluorescent lights, tires, auto batteries and used oil. Beltrami County operates its own local transfer stations, as do the coalition’s other counties, and has a goal of 35 percent recovery of recyclable material. All of the transfer stations truck their sorted material to a multi-stage facility in Polk County, where it’s processed through a MRF, an energy-from-waste plant and the Polk landfill.

Olson says that although the counties participating in the regional integrated solid waste management coalition work together, their needs are unique. To account for these differences, the 818s have functionalities specific to their locations.

“One factor in Sennebogen’s favor was that each machine is designed specifically for the facility that it will work in. We had the CAD drawings to be sure the boom and stick were the right lengths,” Olson says.

Beltrami County acquired the Bemidji transfer station by purchasing it from the previous operator. New material handlers were part of the plan for upgrading the completed facility, as Olson says their previous equipment reached the end of its service life and lacked the versatility they needed.

“We decided to replace the previous rubber-tired machine, which was equipped with a fixed cab that came with the assets [of the facility], with a new purpose-built material handler that includes a hydraulic elevating cab for better visibility and safety on the floor,” Olson says. “We wanted rubber-tired units because they are running on a concrete floor here and running indoors.”

We had our machine operators, our mechanics and our administrators all take part in evaluating the proposals. And that’s how Sennebogen came out on top.” -brian olson

Beyond the larger capacity clam that enables the Sennebogen equipment to handle more waste with each grab, Olson says the coalition chose the 818s for their other convenient features that meet the demands of the facilities’ layouts.

“I’m glad you can walk out onto a platform from the cab with the new unit. You don’t have to crawl up into the machine,” Olson says. “We also equipped it with a front protection guard and a guard on the skylight, installed boom limit switches to suit our ceiling height and added the lighting package. Environmental factors were important in our decision, too—especially noise. You can hardly hear this 818 run, so that was another positive point in its favor.”

The new machine’s design also protects it from undue stresses, Olson says.

“The 818 has an optional boom float capability,” he notes. “With our old machine, the pressure of grabbing garbage would shear off pins in the grapple. With this float feature, you can pick without putting pressure on the grapple or the floor.”

Olson says that ease of maintenance was a top priority when shopping for the material handlers, which was also one of the reasons the group favored the 818s. Most of the routine maintenance to alternators, pumps and hoses can now be conducted through the machine’s main access door, as opposed to techs having to remove multiple hard-to-reach panels to get to internal components. This results in minimized machine downtime and quicker repairs.

“One of the big things that sold me was the ease of maintenance on the Sennebogen 818,” Olson continues. “We can do all the servicing from the ground. The usual wear parts and hoses are all very accessible. You know any machine will go down. Being able to fix it quickly is big in our business. Waste never stops!”

Getting up and running

RMS provided initial operator training as well as maintenance orientation for the teams at the Beltrami and Polk County sites. Although the team at Polk County was used to working with front end loaders, the material handler’s more intuitive controls and features made for an easy learning curve, Olson says.

“With the onboard digital computer display and the various controls, the Sennebogen was the easiest material handler for the operators to jump in and grasp how it worked during the testing phase. All the operators took their turns trying it, and there weren’t as many buttons to push or levers to control to get the thing to do what you wanted it to do,” Olson says.

Although the cab configuration of the Sennebogen was a bit of a departure from the elevated fixed cab setup of the previous material handler in use at the Bemidji site, Olson says the operator quickly got up to speed.

“Our operator [at the Bemidji site] has been running a material handler for years,” Olson says. “There wasn’t much of a learning curve. He just went in and got to work.”

Between the material handler’s larger capacity clam, ease of operation and streamlined maintenance requirements, Olson says that the switch to the Sennebogen machine has already paid dividends for the county.

“You need to have the right equipment to handle a lot of material and load trailers quickly. The Sennebogen does just that,” Olson says.

Robert Adeland is the president of Marketing Strategies & Solutions. He can be reached at robert@marketingstrategiesandsolutions.com.

Weathering several hurricanes in her career helped Janet Archer, a hog farmer in Goldsboro, North Carolina, prepare for Hurricane Florence.

Archer built her hog farm in Wayne County, North Carolina, in 1992, which means she’s survived a few deadly storms. Before Hurricane Florence hit in September 2018, there was Hurricane Fran in 1996, Hurricane Floyd in 1999 and Hurricane Matthew in 2016. Each time, heavy rains caused a river to flow between her home and farm, stranding Archer, her husband, Jack, and farmhands for days. But according to Archer, living through the storms has taught her and other hog farmers in the area valuable lessons about preserving their properties, which helped minimize the amount of waste and loss this past fall.

Seeing the devastation

Hurricane Florence dumped nearly 9 trillion gallons of water on North Carolina. The National Weather Service reported as much as 40 inches of rainfall along some parts of the coast. When all was said and done, the storm claimed five lives and left 1 million residents without power.

In the eastern part of North Carolina, significant rainfall hit Wayne County, which has a flourishing agricultural and livestock presence. Archer says Hurricane Florence brought 27 inches of rain to her farm alone, but the entire pork industry felt its effects. “Everything was challenged,” she says. “Not just livestock.”

Over the course of four days, 10 swine lagoons full of pig waste flooded, 33 overtopped and 6 suffered structural damage throughout the state, according to the North Carolina Department of Environmental Equality (DEQ).

The storm resulted in the loss of 5,500 hogs. But when framed in relation to the 2,000-plus hog farms that operate in the state, Archer says the loss was “minimal,” in part because farmers were more prepared thanks to their familiarity with storm preparation.

“Every loss is heartbreaking,” Archer says. “We had a generator fail. We’ve lost some animals. There was a barn roof that collapsed. We had much worse in Hurricane Floyd because we were not as prepared. One of the reasons farms did so well this time is because we learned some hard lessons from past hurricanes.”

Precautionary planning

On the state level, North Carolina preemptively closed some hog farms that reside in low-lying, flood-prone areas to mitigate damage. But on a local level, Archer says the community had to take it upon itself to plan and strategize before the storm.

“We’ve been through a lot of storms,” Archer says. “You always have to prepare. You always have to understand what’s going on. The advantage of a hurricane is you know it’s coming.”

By the time Hurricane Florence made landfall in mid-September, area hog farmers had already moved more than 20,000 pigs to higher, safer ground.

Days before the storm, Archer filled feed carts to the brim. She stocked up on enough fuel for the generator to power the farm for a week, and she made sure there was enough food and water for everyone on the farm.

“Somebody has to live on the farm with the animals,” Archer says. “We have a pull-out couch on the farm. Whoever stays has hot coffee, a hot shower and a bed. No cell service, but they can survive.”

Archer’s farm uses a manure lagoon as a waste management system. Despite their negative reputation in the national media, lagoons are a central part of sustainability at hog farms. With a 19-inch border around the edge in case of flooding, the lagoons hold and treat waste. Naturally occurring anaerobic bacteria in the lagoons breaks down solid waste into fertilizer, which farmers use to grow crops.

“Sustainability is a buzzword now, but it has been how we’ve survived for centuries,” Archer says. “Agriculture has a very low margin, and income has declined for 12 consecutive years, so we’re always looking for ways to turn a waste product into something to use. Even with manure, it may be defined as waste, but to us, it’s a nutrient.”

Archer says there are two “action points” hog farmers use to manage the lagoons before hurricanes. One way to prevent flooding is to drain the lagoon days before heavy rainfall is expected, she says. Hog farmers also keep extensive records on the lagoons along with soil samples to monitor phosphorous, potassium and nitrogen levels, which are inspected by the state.

“There can’t be any runoff,” Archer says. “It can’t leak through the soil. Municipalities can dump raw sewage in a creek or river and pay a fine. We have a zero-discharge requirement. Nothing we produce can leave our farm.”

When there is an issue with a lagoon, the DEQ investigates and then follows up to ensure the farm falls back into compliance with its permit, which is specific to each farm.

After the storm, farmers are responsible for their own cleanup. When her neighborhood experiences mass flooding and animal mortalities, Archer says the community pulls its resources together to clear debris and roadways so feed trucks and residents have access.

“All the farms stay in contact with each other to see who needs what,” Archer says. “We had caravans to help people get feed and supplies to areas. Farmers have equipment that general homeowners don’t have, and everyone works together.”

Waste to resources

Over the years, the pork industry has found solutions and created plans for mass animal mortalities after hurricanes.

Mark Rice, the director of North Carolina State University’s Animal and Poultry Management Center, says the center was founded in the 1990s to explore alternative uses of byproducts from animal waste and mortalities following natural disasters.

The purpose was to create value from the byproducts “that could help the farm income, so you weren’t just disposing of the mortality,” Rice says. “You could actually take that, process it and create something that can be used in another industry.”

Once approved by the state, the center started using hog and poultry carcasses as compost and blending it with soybeans to produce carp feed for the commercial fishing industry, Rice says.

In the early 2000s, the center also started to explore alternative uses for swine waste and treatment technologies, such as those used in manure lagoons.

“The focus was to offset costs and add value to that waste stream,” Rice says.

Because of the center’s leading research, hog farms today are able to convert captured methane gas from waste into renewable energy.

Smithfield Foods, one of the country’s largest meat-processing companies based in Smithfield, Virginia, announced plans in October 2018 to implement “manure-to-energy” projects across 90 percent of its hog spaces in North Carolina and Utah. As part of evolving sustainability efforts, Smithfield plans on converting existing anaerobic treatment lagoons to “new covered digesters to capture biogas,” which will be transported to central processing facilities and converted into renewable natural gas in North Carolina, Missouri and Utah.

Protecting pork

Archer has been a hog farmer for more than 40 years. In fact, she met her husband on a pig farm. Together, they’ve raised hogs in four different countries and four different states.

Archer is originally from upper Michigan, where farmers can’t rely on treatment lagoons to manage waste because of the colder temperatures. She says in the Midwest, farmers can’t manage and treat waste outside away from the animals, and she’s grateful to be in a more temperate climate that permits it.

Despite the benefits of anaerobic treatment lagoons, North Carolina’s pork industry faced scrutiny from media organizations after Hurricane Florence, in part because of the environmental impacts linked to overflowing lagoons.

Andy Curliss, CEO at the North Carolina Pork Council, which advocates on behalf of the state’s pork industry, recently wrote a blog about the real “threat” of Hurricane Florence, pointing to misleading headlines about the damage caused by these waste sources.

Curliss says hog farms are inevitably going to flood when affected by hurricanes, but he echoes Archer by highlighting the industry’s “significant steps” taken since Hurricane Floyd to lessen environmental impacts, including closing farms and lagoons in most flood-prone areas.

After Hurricane Florence, the DEQ’s incident tracker painted a real picture of the storm’s damage. While the department reported 1,957 incidents on farms across the state, only six needed “urgent action.” Farmers at the state’s 2,000 hog farms, meanwhile, took action to resolve prospective issues before they became critical.

In the aftermath of the storm, hog farmers in Wayne County eventually returned to their daily operations. Despite the unpredictability of when the next hurricane might impact the area, Archer says she is sure the community will be prepared.

“Our job is taking care of those animals,” Archer says. “It doesn’t matter what the weather is doing.”

The author is a digital editor for Waste Today and can be contacted at kmaile@gie.net.

Regardless of how long a driver has been on the road, unexpected issues are sure to arise. Even drivers with the most experience may not be fully equipped to handle split-second decision-making, from maneuvering a truck with a blown-out tire to dodging a child who darts into the street. But thanks to steadily advancing training technologies, drivers can now get those critical experiences without ever having to step foot out of the station.

Commercial driving simulators, now available for a range of truck types, can put a driver in nearly any road situation to provide both real-time feedback and data for ongoing improvement. It’s a piece of technology waste fleets are beginning to put to use, and for a good reason—it has the potential to save not just time and money, but also lives.

“Some of our customers have seen anywhere from a 30 to 60 percent crash rate reduction with the simulator training,” says Matt Derby, the marketing manager for L3 Driver Training Solutions, a branch of the New York-based L3 Technologies that supplies driving simulators and training to haulers. “I’d rather have somebody fail and learn 100 times in here and get it right than even one time out on the road with an actual vehicle where people are getting hurt or equipment’s getting damaged.”

In 2017, the fatal incident rate for waste collection workers was 10 times higher than the industry average, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). In an industry that remains the fifth deadliest in the U.S., fleet managers looking to train drivers efficiently while minimizing damages and injuries may find a solution in simulation.

Custom training

Modern driving simulators are stunningly realistic, some comparable to an amped-up, immersive version of Grand Theft Auto complete with hypersensitive reactions to every movement. The latest simulators mirror nearly every piece of equipment present in a truck cab, including a driving seat, force-loaded steering wheel, brake and accelerator pedals, a clutch and shifter for multi-geared transmissions, various gauges, and even heating and air conditioning controls. Some include three-panel setups with a screen on each to give drivers a 180-degree field of vision not only of the road in front of them, but also of their peripheral views through two door windows and simulated side mirrors. In addition to the realistic cab, managers can program specific truck specs, like height and weight, into the simulators so they react to each movement the same way a real truck would.

The technical setup prepares drivers for the seemingly infinite number of scenarios they can encounter during the simulation. Those in charge of the training can integrate a number of challenges into the course: navigating a steep, gravelly hill in a downpour without tipping the truck; moving through crowded city streets on a snowy evening; steering around people that dash into the street; even maneuvering a fully loaded truck with a popped tire quickly off the highway. Fleet managers can program every detail into the course, down to the individuals standing on street corners. Drivers feel every bump, curb and puddle along the way.

“It’s about building up those positive habits behind the wheel and really providing an experiential training environment,” Derby says.

The mighty customization potential results in a targeted training tool that can improve both skill and efficiency. Fleet managers who conduct regular safety training can use simulators to home in on specific skills or route challenges. One session, for example, may focus on space and speed management, while another may focus on defensive driving. Most simulators offer a wealth of data, allowing managers to monitor speed, stopping distances, performance in key areas and more, which can help them target and improve on problem areas for individual employees.

Simulators also offer a consistent training option that doesn’t require having to pull every driver into a room at once. “Obviously most of your fleet, they need to be out on the road doing routes ... and you don’t want to take up too much of their time. So it’s a great tool for being able to rotate through training throughout the year, and it’s a lot more effective at assessing how safe drivers are out there,” Derby says.

Training for all skill sets

Simulators can be an effective training tool for all employees, no matter their experience level. Fleet managers can use the simulator to screen new drivers for a baseline measurement of their driving capabilities. They can also use it as a pre-screening tool when conducting interviews and deciding who to hire.

Along with regular targeted training for employees, the technology can even be used to turn negative situations into learning experiences. If a driver gets into an accident on the road, fleet managers can completely recreate the scenario in the simulator to go over best practices and how the incident could have been avoided. The course can become a teaching tool not just for the driver involved, but also for the entire fleet, Derby says.

Even veteran drivers can benefit from regular training with a simulator. Derby says when L3 representatives conduct training sessions at customer facilities, drivers of all abilities walk away learning something, from new hires to seasoned drivers. “You may have a veteran driver out there that’s been on the road for 30 years. They may think they’re hot stuff ... but I guarantee you there’s always something that we can throw at million-mile drivers that they haven’t [seen yet]” Derby says.

Safety pays

Regular training with the simulator can result in major safety improvements. The technology exposes drivers to a string of dangerous situations that would be near impossible to stage in real life without putting them in harm’s way. Repeat exposure to these situations can help the driver internalize and better handle them out on the road, leading to a reduction in incidents. Even for those uncontrollable situations, Derby says simulation training can often help lessen the impact.

“There’re situations out there where the driver won’t have complete control. But the big thing is, can you minimize it? Can you bring down the severity of it so it doesn’t cost as much?” Derby says.

While the technology isn’t cheap—L3’s simulators, for example, start at more than $100,000 a piece to purchase without any additional add-ons—the resulting safety improvements could reap major financial savings. Beyond the savings earned by maintaining safe employees and minimizing their downtime, training on simulators can also be easier on equipment. Fewer accidents mean fewer repairs for trucks. Training on the simulator can even result in employees driving more fuel-consciously if efficiency in that area is emphasized during training.

If an employee is involved in an accident that results in litigation, simulation training can even be a major benefit in court. Derby says companies can use the simulator’s training records in their defense to point to the measures they’ve taken to avoid collisions, which could potentially help diminish sanctions.

As simulation technology becomes more mainstream and developed for niche markets, its presence in the waste management sphere is sure to pick up. When used in combination with in-person training sessions and on-the-road experience, driving simulators can take collection safety to the next level.

The author is the assistant editor for Waste Today magazine and can be contacted at tcottom@gie.net.