The need for more significant investment in U.S. solid waste infrastructure is a topic of national conversation. Both private- and public-sector entities are weighing in on the financial investment needed to mend our domestic recycling markets and develop better-localized systems for reusing waste. The federal government has recently proposed solid waste-related bills that include programs that will allocate taxpayer funding to help communities invest in zero waste to landfill (ZWL) infrastructure; however, the federal government and private industry alike are still weighing the real economic investment needed to build domestic solid waste infrastructure with the processing capabilities to responsibly handle all U.S. solid waste.
According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Americans generated 267.8 million tons of municipal solid waste (MSW) in 2017—52 percent, or 139 million tons, of which were landfilled. Even though sustainable waste management practices are widely accepted by municipalities and private industries, the current MSW infrastructure in the U.S. does not have the processing capacity for all communities to handle municipal waste at its highest and best use. In 2017, the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) acknowledged the need for making significant investments in solid waste processing technology as part of its “2017 Infrastructure Report Card for Solid Waste Management.” In this report, ASCE graded the country’s infrastructure with a C+. Additionally, the ASCE highlighted that the country’s solid waste infrastructure, though it was functional, lacked the waste recovery facilities—and technology—needed to support significant diversion in most communities.
The lack of advanced processing is due, in part, to low landfill tip fees. Investing in automated mechanical separation, chemical reformation and energy recovery simply requires more capital than sending waste to landfills. Fortunately, communities are partnering with private industry to invest in solutions such as single-stream municipal recovery facilities (MRFs), composting facilities and conversion technologies to make these investments more economically viable. For example, the Municipal Review Committee Inc. (MRC), a nonprofit that represents 115 municipalities in Maine, has partnered with Fiberight LLC to develop a mechanical biological treatment (MBT) processing facility in Hampden, Maine. This privately owned facility is expected to divert “80 percent of the material it receives either into renewable energy or recycling.”
When fully operational, the facility is expected to process 180,000 tons of MSW per year from 104 communities. Overall, the facility comprises a $70 million investment financed through a combination of equity and tax-exempt bonds and will have a tipping fee of around $70 per ton. It is worth noting that MBT facilities have enjoyed broad adoption across the European Union (EU) where they are used to recover recyclables and produce solid recovered fuel (SRF) that can serve as a substitute for coal.
Let us consider for a moment the capital investment it would take for the nation to pursue a zero waste goal of diverting 90 percent of the 139 million tons of solid waste that is currently going to landfill using mixed processing facilities with MBT technology. If we used mixed processing on the front end to maximize material recovery and thermal processing technologies as a secondary processing unit for the non-recyclable material, we estimate the country would need to spend between $100-$120 billion to cover the capital expenditures of the new facilities needed to handle 139 million tons. Using a private-sector capital recovery factor of 15 percent implies the U.S. would have to invest between $100 and $125 per ton of solid waste processed. This analysis does not consider facility operating costs or revenue earned from the sale of products and energy.
Understanding the capital intensity of ZWL infrastructure can help us better evaluate the cost of investing in other zero waste practices that call for source reduction of materials, such as extended producer responsibility bills. With an idea of how much it costs to process solid waste through advanced processing technology, we can better evaluate decisions on whether it is more cost-effective to invest in end-of-life processing for a ton of solid waste or invest in ways to stop the creation of that ton of waste from being developed in the first place. These discussions will truly push our country towards a more sustainable future that can yield a healthier and more equitable solid waste system for all.
Tomra opens recycling business unit in North Carolina
Tomra Sorting Recycling, a sensor-based sorting technology company with headquarters in Norway, has celebrated the opening of its new Tomra Sorting Inc. office in Charlotte, North Carolina. Tomra reports that the new location in North America serves as a waste and metals recycling headquarters for customers operating in North America, Central America and South America.
In addition to the new Charlotte location, Tomra Sorting Inc. has offices dedicated to the food and material sorting businesses in West Sacramento, California; Englewood, Colorado; and Shelton, Connecticut.
“Tomra’s customer base in the Americas continues to grow, and opening our Charlotte office to focus solely on waste and metals sorting is the best way to serve and support our customers and partners,” says Carlos Manchado Atienza, regional director Americas for Tomra Sorting Inc. “With Tomra’s global growth, new Circular Economy business unit and recent and planned 2020 sorting solutions releases, Tomra leads the charge for the better use of resources. Our East Coast recycling headquarters will make Tomra stronger for our customers.”
According to a news release from Tomra, the new Charlotte location serves as a hub for Tomra Sorting’s North American field sales. The location also centralizes the company’s recycling project management, inside sales, customer service and field service team members. Tomra reports that its sales and service teams in Mexico, Latin America and Brazil will also rely on the Charlotte office to streamline customer support and sales efforts.
Tomra offers a range of sensor-based sorting solutions for the waste and metal recycling industries, including Autosort, Combisense, Finder and X-Tract. The company also recently introduced new Insight and Gain technologies. Insight provides real-time monitoring of sorting lines to deliver digital metrics for the status and performance of sorting equipment, while Gain is a deep learning-based add-on to Tomra Autosort.
Dover acquires software provider to waste, recycling industry
Dover Corp., headquartered in Downers Grove, Illinois, has acquired So. Cal. Soft-Pak Inc., a San Diego-based software provider to the waste and recycling fleet industry. So. Cal. Soft-Pak offers integrated back office, route management and customer relationship management software solutions.
According to a news release from Dover, Soft-Pak has a 30-year track record of serving hundreds of waste and recycling fleets nationwide with software solutions tailored to fleet customers’ unique needs. In 2014, the company launched its Mobile-Pak in-cab connected tablet solution, which includes real-time GPS tracking, route management and various functionalities allowing integration of moving fleet data into the hauler’s back office.
Dover reports that Soft-Pak will become part of its Environmental Solutions Group business unit, a supplier of waste handling solutions to the North American waste and recycling industry in Dover’s Engineered Products segment. Terms of the transaction were not disclosed.
The acquisition enhances Dover’s Environmental Solutions Group’s digital offerings centered around connected refuse vehicle and productivity-enhancing solutions, Dover says. Further integration between a fleet’s mobile assets, customer management and back office operations will position the company’s Environmental Solutions Group to deliver an integrated offering for the refuse vehicle market.
“We are excited to bring together Soft-Pak’s well-recognized industry-specific software solutions and [Environmental Solutions Group’s] growing software and digital portfolio. We believe the integrated solutions will drive growth of [the Environmental Solutions Group’s] core refuse vehicle offering and associated software and deliver tangible value-add to our waste and recycling industry customers,” says Richard J. Tobin, Dover president and CEO. “This transaction is another building block in Dover’s capital deployment strategy that emphasizes investments in attractive close-to-core markets that offer potential for sustainable, profitable growth.”
According to Dover, the company expects this acquisition to be accretive to the growth and margin profile of Environmental Solutions Group and Dover and to achieve double-digit return on capital in three years.
It’s no big secret that landfills are a highly coveted asset for those operating in the solid waste industry. Companies that own landfills control their costs in ways others can’t, offering a competitive advantage especially in areas with limited disposal options.
In fact, landfill ownership is the cornerstone of integrated waste businesses that are able to buttress themselves from third party pricing and market fluctuations that can compromise a company’s bottom line.
As Laurel Mountain Partners Managing Director Jeff Kendall told the audience during his keynote address at Waste Today’s 2019 Corporate Growth Conference, integrated businesses that include a network of landfills, transfer stations and hauling operations are the most stable since they don’t have to rely on outside entities for their collection, processing or disposal needs.
“One thing you want to try to avoid is having a high percentage of your business with brokers,” Kendall noted. “There are a lot of brokers out there, and it’s hard to be in business anywhere without doing some business with them. But if you have a high percentage of your business with brokers, that’s going to be viewed negatively, especially by the national [companies] if they’re looking to purchase you. … There’s not a lot of value there because you’re not controlling your cash flow in those instances.”
To elaborate further on Kendall’s point, it’s not just those who control landfills, but those with the most remaining capacity that sit in prime position to handle changes in end markets, collection pricing and other variables in both the near and long term. Since getting permitting is often no easy task for these operators (and is only getting to be more of a challenge), the companies that have been able to secure these assets have helped cement themselves as the “haves” among the “have-nots.”
In this issue, we take a look at who the largest players are in the landfill space relative to volume accepted in 2019, as well as what the projected closure date is of these facilities.
This Largest Landfills List marks the second edition compiled by the staff at Waste Today and highlights several notable changes since the first iteration debuted in March 2018.
Through the help of industry collaborators, publicly available information and corroboration from the operators themselves, we’re hopeful this database can serve as a useful snapshot of not only where the industry is today, but who stands to control disposal interests long into the future.
For a look at who’s leading the pack with incoming volumes and remaining capacity in the U.S., check out Waste Today’s Largest Landfill List in order to see which companies stand atop the industry.
All in
Features - Cover Story
How Recology’s recovery-first philosophy is propelling waste’s largest employee-owned company into the future.
It doesn’t take long talking to Recology President and CEO Michael J. Sangiacomo to see that the San Francisco-based waste management company has a different perspective than most other companies operating today.
With a vision predicated on “a world without waste,” Sangiacomo stresses that the company’s sustainability-minded focus doesn’t just pertain to its collection operations, it is part of a larger ideal centered on building a company designed to last.
A strong foundation
According to Sangiacomo, Recology traces its roots back to San Francisco’s Gold Rush era when immigrants came from Italy to make a living sorting through the city’s refuse in search of salvageable materials. They washed, repackaged and sold bottles to wineries; sorted rags and papers from other refuse; and recovered wood and other reusable materials. Eventually, waste collection became more organized in the city, and the descendants of the first wave of Italian immigrants helped incorporate the first Recology operating company in 1920.
Over the years, the company has steadily grown and expanded its operations. Within the last 20 years, the company has branched out to expand its California operations beyond the Bay Area and has set up divisions in both Oregon and Washington. Today, Recology leverages its 45 operating companies and network of 3,800 employees to provide service to more than 140 communities, serving more than 889,000 residential and 112,000 commercial customers. With its 20 company-owned facilities and fleet of 1,300 vehicles, Sangiacomo says Recology collected and processed 2.8 million tons of material in 2019, making it the eighth largest waste and recycling firm in the industry.
The importance of diversion
Photo by Madeo Photogarphy
Of the 2.8 million tons of material the company collected in 2019, Sangiacomo says that much of it was repurposed through programs for reuse, recycling, composting or energy generation.
Even though others in the industry have begun to rethink their recycling and reuse programs in the wake of China’s National Sword, Sangiacomo says the ramifications of China’s policy have only entrenched Recology’s emphasis on resource recovery.
“Resource recovery is the guiding force behind our work at Recology and has remained so in the wake of China’s National Sword,” he says. “We believe China’s policy change was the wakeup call the industry and public needed to clean up our material stream and evaluate our capacity to handle material domestically. [Our company] began by processing materials locally; we believe we need to return to that paradigm.”
He says that beyond necessary operational changes waste companies need to make to adjust to current market conditions, new policies are required to support sustainable materials management.
Sangiacomo says that over the past year, Recology has been vocal in pushing for policy reform, including challenging the plastics industry to be better stewards of the products they create. He says the company’s work has been centered on challenging producers to make consumer packaging products more recyclable and create a market for materials that currently have no value after their single use.
Late last year, alongside two other signatories, Sangiacomo filed a ballot measure in California that, among other goals, seeks to create a funding mechanism for recycling infrastructure. The proposed measure would require state regulations to reduce plastic waste, tax producers of single-use plastics and fund environmental programs.
While the company’s mission is bold, Sangiacomo says that a comprehensive approach to diversion is needed to change the status quo.
“We continue to advocate for source reduction as a key to success,” he says. “Making less stuff, consuming less, and asking producers of consumer goods and packaging to design [products] to last and prioritize reuse and recycling remain important tenets to our success in diverting from landfills.”
Another priority in the company’s quest to make recycling more viable is helping residents cut down on contamination at the curb. Sangiacomo says the company’s drivers are key in helping spread the message on what should go in the waste cart and what can be diverted.
“Our drivers are our principal connection with our customers,” he says. “They’re the most visible representatives of Recology, picking up recyclables, compostables and garbage every single day. They talk to customers and develop relationships, supporting our efforts to become an integrated part of the community.”
The company also deploys its Waste Zero teams to provide education and outreach services to the public. Currently, 60 Recology employees serve on these teams, which visit schools, community organizations, restaurants, hotels and businesses to help set up and properly manage recycling and composting programs. Sangiacomo says these teams tailor programs to meet the specific needs of the customer at no additional cost.
Complicating the company’s efforts to reduce contamination is the growing reliance on composting in the areas the company operates.
Recology built the first large-scale compost facility in California in 1996. In 2002, the company launched a three-cart collection system in San Francisco and asked residents and businesses to separate recyclables, organics and residuals. In 2004, the city enacted a mandatory recycling ordinance, and on the coattails of this ordinance’s success, San Francisco passed a mandatory composting ordinance in 2009.
To help meet the increased processing demands for the organics the company collects, Recology owns and operates five compost facilities in California and three in Oregon. After the company collects waste at the curb, food and yard waste materials are generally transferred to one of these facilities and turned into nutrient-rich compost that is sold to landscapers, farmers, vintners and community gardens.
According to Sangiacomo, being able to process organics has yielded substantial benefits to the community.
“Our organic waste programs are recognized as trendsetting throughout the industry. … Organics collection and processing represents a huge opportunity to keep valuable resources out of the landfill and reduce methane produced by the decomposition of organic matter,” he says. “Composting this organic material helps replace diminishing topsoil and return nutrients to the soil to produce healthy plants. Composting provides one of the largest opportunities to recycle material and support closed loop ecosystems.”
Making the investment
Regardless of the level of community education the company undertakes, Recology remains the last line of defense in combating contamination and increasing the purity of its recycling operations.
Recycle Central at Pier 96 is the 200,000-square-foot sorting facility that serves as the workhorse of the company’s San Francisco’s recycling program. Over the past four years, the company has invested more than $20 million at the facility installing state-of-the-art recycling equipment to help improve its operations. The new machines have wider conveyor belts, run at higher speeds and help keep material like single-use plastic out of finished bales of mixed paper.
In September 2019, Recology installed four Max-AI AQC robots from Bulk Handling Systems at the facility. The robots are tasked with recovering plastic that would otherwise be lost as residue and helping ensure the company is outputting high-quality bales of finished plastics. The robots also work to improve quality control for PET bottles, recover natural and color HDPE that may have been missed by existing optical sorters, and remove black plastics that optical sorters have trouble identifying.
According to Sangiacomo, these robots aren’t meant to be a replacement for existing staff, but rather, a complement.
“We see automation as an important next step toward technological advancement in recycling, but this new technology cannot replace human judgment,” he says. “The robotic sorting machines at Recycle Central will be used to perform some of the dirtier jobs, and employees will be provided more technical positions, [allowing them to] develop new skills needed to manage and maintain high-tech equipment.”
In addition to the company’s recycling infrastructure, Recology has also made the investment in more sustainable fleet technology.
Sangiacomo says that Recology maintains a portfolio of eight fuel and energy types and is moving towards more renewable fuel sources each year. Recently, the company contracted with New Way and BYD to build two first-of-their-kind rear load electric collection vehicles in partnership with the city of Seattle. These investments are all part of a greater plan to lessen the company’s reliance on fossil fuels.
“We are committed to transitioning away from conventional fossil fuels and have committed to power 90 percent of our fleet by renewable or alternative energy sources by 2022, leveraging our existing use of renewable diesel, biomethane fuels and fleet electrification. … We continually seek to embrace innovation in vehicle technology as we work to define what a 21st century collection vehicle can—and should—look like,” he says.
A people-first business
In 1986, Recology implemented an employee stock ownership plan. This decision established Recology as one of the largest 100-percent employee-owned companies in the United States.
Sangiacomo says that this arrangement has yielded greater buy-in from employees, which has helped to propel the company’s growth.
“Recology is the largest employee-owned company in the waste industry. Employee ownership has benefited Recology by fostering a culture of individual and collective hard work and dedication that directly benefits employee-owners and affects the long-term success of the company,” he says. “As owners, each employee shares in the company’s success. The immediacy of that relationship motivates employees to invest in their work, resulting in greater customer satisfaction and quality products and services.”
Although the company’s ownership structure and recovery-first ethos might differ from other haulers, Sangiacomo says that it is all part of Recology’s mission to do what’s right versus what is easy.
“What has worked for Recology is prioritizing people, providing great service and caring for the environment,” he says.
"Resource recovery is the guiding force behind our work at Recology and has remained so in the wake of China’s National Sword,” – Michael J. Sangiacomo, CEO, RECOLOGY
“Our employees are owners of our business and must be treated fairly. They are our primary contact with our customers and seek to integrate Recology into our communities to provide exemplary service. We are dedicated stewards of the environment, especially in the areas where Recology operates, and have found that our customers maintain similar values,” he says. If it’s true that you reap what you sow, it should be no surprise that Recology’s history of investing in its people, the communities it operates in and the environment has helped the company establish itself as one of the most successful in waste. But despite its successes over the last 100 years, Sangiacomo says the company remains as steadfast as ever in making sure it’s doing right by its stakeholders.
“There are many opportunities for Recology to grow, expand our service offerings, create greater and more localized processing infrastructure, make diversion successes, and find new and better ways of accomplishing our goals,” he says. “But we will always remain focused on selecting the opportunities that create value for Recology owners and the communities we serve.”
The author is the editor of Waste Today magazine and can be contacted at aredling@gie.net.
Sun Services’ switch to Sennebogen material handlers leads to greater savings, processing capacity
Sun Services in Beltsville, Maryland, has served the waste and recycling needs of customers throughout Maryland, northern Virginia, eastern West Virginia, southern Pennsylvania and Washington D.C. since 2004. Specializing in commercial disposal, residential demolition recycling projects and construction dumpster rental, their team relies on streamlined operations to increase efficiency and maximize production.
Determined to capitalize on its thriving hauling operation, Sun Services constructed a new construction and demolition (C&D) recycling plant in October 2013 to better leverage the value of the materials it collected.
The company designed the 33,000-square-foot plant on five acres to house all material loading and processing under one roof for local ordinance compliance. As such, having the right equipment to safely and effectively handle the vast volumes of incoming material was of paramount importance.
That’s why in 2018, when the time came to replace the company’s existing excavators used for loading material into its shredder, Sun Services President Brian Shipp did his due diligence to find the best equipment on the market.
After researching and testing various options, the Sennebogen 818 material handler track unit won Shipp and his team over thanks to its versatility and maneuverability as well as its potential for fuel and cost savings. Sun Services added a rotating demolition grapple attachment to the equipment for increased functionality.
“We wanted to get machines that had an elevated cab as well as a rotating grapple that could pick the material a lot better,” Shipp says. “We also wanted to visually inspect what was in the grapple and be able to spin the load around before we dropped it in the shredder. The Sennebogen 818 material handlers offered that flexibility. Also, they priced out lower than the other equipment, and we didn’t have to worry about a lot of wasted pump power for digging that you sacrifice [while] running excavators. So, the setup of the machine was actually way more fuel efficient than a regular excavator of a comparable size.”
Shipp says the company purchased three 818s—two to run consecutively and one to switch out every week for Sun Services’ scheduled cleaning and preventative maintenance service. While Sun Services is always mindful of maximizing its equipment’s uptime, once the company received the material handlers, Shipp says he wasted no time in seeing what they were capable of.
“We handle a large volume of construction and demolition debris that is brought here from our roll-off dumpsters,” Shipp says. “We set it up so a wheel loader pushes the pile of debris up to where the Sennebogen is sitting. Then, our operator does a sort with the material handler, which we’ve outfitted with a grapple to get out any big steel or concrete pieces that we don't want going through the shredder. On any given day, the machine handles 500 to 700 tons of C&D debris over 10 to 12 hours. I’ve been in both the excavators and material handlers, and there is no comparison—the material handlers can move a lot more material than a comparable sized excavator.”
Beyond the improvements in processing capacity, Shipp says the Sennebogen’s design is more operator-friendly.
“The design of the Sennebogen definitely allows more freedom for the operator,” Shipp says. “There's a lot more room, and the cooling system works a lot better than a standard excavator. There's also a lot more open space with the way the engine is mounted. In these units, the engine is placed parallel with the stick versus perpendicular across the back. So, there's a lot more room for the cooling package, and the Sennebogen machine is able to deal with the dust a lot better than a standard excavator does. But the fact that the cabs are huge in these units is ideal for our operators because being able to work for 10-plus hours a day without feeling encapsulated makes for a better environment and is good for their wellbeing.”
Shipp says that with all the benefits the Sennebogen material handlers offer, perhaps the greatest is their ability to keep working long after other machines reach the end of their service life.
“With our rugged environment, our excavators were pretty much trashed at about 7,000 hours. With this set of Sennebogen equipment, we’re hopeful we can double that, and with the volumes we process, that is significant.”
North America’s largest waste haulers stretch from coast to coast, generating tens of billions of dollars in revenue and employing hundreds of thousands of employees. View More